In a recent episode of Fox News’ “The Five,” commentator Jessica Tarlov stirred a wave of reaction following her remarks on how the United States should approach the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The conversation began with a discussion of former President Donald Trump’s reported ideas for post-war Gaza and quickly evolved into a broader debate about potential solutions for displaced Palestinian civilians.

Tarlov, a regular liberal voice on the panel, challenged the feasibility and ethics of Trump’s alleged plan to take over the Gaza Strip. She emphasized that such proposals could be viewed as inflammatory by surrounding Arab nations, some of whom have already expressed strong opposition.

“This solution is untenable,” she said, referencing statements by Arab leaders who view forced resettlement plans as a provocation. “Former Prime Minister of Jordan said this is a declaration of war on the Arab people. If he [Trump] is such a humanitarian, then bring those 2 million people here to the U.S. and resettle them.”

Her suggestion—resettling displaced Palestinians in the United States—sparked an immediate reaction from fellow co-hosts, who questioned the practicality and implications of such a move. Dana Perino pointed out that other nations, including Albania, have expressed a willingness to assist, though only on a much smaller scale. Tarlov acknowledged this but emphasized the sheer scale of the displacement. “You’re talking about 2 million people,” she said.

Co-host Jesse Watters injected a touch of sarcasm, joking, “Spread them out. Maybe some can go to Greenland.” The light-hearted remark contrasted sharply with the heavy subject matter, and the discussion continued with an undertone of tension.

Tarlov also raised questions about the motivation behind some of the ideas circulating about Gaza’s future. Referring to past remarks made by Jared Kushner regarding Gaza’s potential for development, she speculated whether business interests might be influencing policy proposals. “Maybe there are some great contracts to come,” she said.

At one point, co-host Jeanine Pirro challenged Tarlov’s view: “So what should we do, let them live in rubble and hate the westerners and hate everyone else?” she asked.

Tarlov clarified that her concern was about responsibility. “You can’t make Jordan open up,” she responded. “If you’re the one who is going to drop in and save everybody, don’t you have to put some of your money where your mouth is?”

The conversation became more intense when the co-hosts began debating the level of U.S. aid already directed toward Gaza. Watters reminded the group that the U.S. has historically provided substantial financial support. “We have funded Gaza more than any other country,” he said.

Still, Tarlov returned to her central point: that solutions must consider the human reality of the displaced population. “You cannot say to all of the neighboring countries that they just need to make room for millions of people that they don’t want,” she said.

As tensions rose, Pirro stepped in with a more calming message. “It’s not about forcing Jordan or anyone else. It is about making people realize that for economic success in that region, we need to have peace and rebuilding of Gaza.”

Perino added that the situation could serve as an opportunity to challenge the region’s status quo and encourage broader cooperation among Arab nations. “This makes the Arab world have to step up. It is smart,” she said.

As the conversation drew to a close, Watters offered a final word of encouragement aimed at Tarlov: “And instead, Jessica, of saying, ‘No, we can’t,’ let’s try, ‘Yes, we can.’”

The segment has since circulated widely, with reactions spanning a wide spectrum. Supporters of Tarlov say her comments reflect a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths about global responsibility and humanitarian care. Critics argue that her suggestion was unrealistic and politically provocative.

At the core of the discussion is a deeply complex issue—how the international community should respond to the displacement of civilians in conflict zones. Tarlov’s comments, though polarizing, have added another layer to an already urgent and multifaceted conversation.

As the war in Gaza continues and diplomatic tensions rise, such debates will likely remain a central part of how media and governments shape the public understanding of humanitarian responsibility, immigration policy, and the pursuit of peace in the Middle East.