The Shadow Guard: Why the FBI’s Second-in-Command Now Lives Under 24/7 Protection

FBI Assigns Full-Time Security Detail to Deputy Director Bongino

In a move that underscores heightened concern about internal threats or public exposure, the FBI has assembled a multi-agency security detail to protect Deputy Director Dan Bongino around the clock. He is reportedly the first person in his position to receive such coverage, which may require as many as 20 agents rotating shifts—even inside agency headquarters.

This security upgrade follows a recent internal request by the FBI asking agents to volunteer for temporary duty assignments assisting Bongino’s new detail. Those asked to volunteer would be pulled from their regular roles to ensure constant protection.


New Level of Protection for a High-Profile Deputy

Bongino, a former Secret Service agent and New York police officer, is no stranger to security concerns, though he previously opted not to carry a firearm in his current role, relying instead on the protective detail. His predecessor, Paul Abbate, had only a part-time agent accompany him to select engagements.

This change is notable: full security details are typically reserved for the FBI Director and the U.S. Attorney General. The decision to extend such coverage to Bongino raises questions about perceived threats, internal risk considerations, or political calculations.

Some critics have voiced skepticism. Former senior FBI official Frank Figliuzzi told NBC News, “What is the actual risk and threat here, or is this merely prestige? This is taxpayer money.” The concern is that providing such high-level protection for a deputy could be overreach unless clearly justified.


Bongino Speaks on Social Media

Over the weekend, Bongino took to X (formerly Twitter) to address the situation and comment on the broader mission of reforming the FBI. Returning to Washington after a day at home, he emphasized the need for discretion.

“Because of the sensitivity of the work we do, the Director and I have to be circumspect in what we share publicly,” he wrote. “Bad actors read this stuff too.” He urged patience, saying that results may not always be visible but that progress is underway.

In a second post, he asked the public to consider how much of the full story remains confidential due to legal and ethical constraints. He acknowledged that asking for trust without full context is difficult, but asked critics to “watch what happens” and allow time to bring clarity to decisions that may seem opaque.


What This May Suggest

This development might reflect a variety of underlying concerns:

  1. Heightened Threat Profile: As Deputy Director, Bongino is involved in sensitive national security and internal FBI reforms, which could attract threats from actors opposed to his agenda.

  2. Organizational Shift: The promotion of a full security detail may indicate a shift in how senior FBI leadership is protected, possibly in response to broader internal changes or political pressures.

  3. Symbolic Signaling: Granting extraordinary protection in an era of reform sends a message internally and publicly: this is a high-stakes, high-visibility position.

  4. Transparency vs. Secrecy Dynamics: Bongino’s public statements suggest he is anticipating criticism, but also resigning himself to the fact that certain decisions cannot be fully explained in real time—citing national security and internal constraints.


What’s Unknown

Many details remain unconfirmed:

  • The exact size, composition, and funding for the security detail is not publicly disclosed.

  • It’s unclear whether the decision was based on a specific intelligence threat or preemptive security doctrine.

  • The relationship between this protection and Bongino’s expected responsibilities in FBI reform is not fully known.

  • How this decision is viewed internally—in terms of morale, resource allocation, or rank structure—is not public.


Next Steps to Watch

  • Official explanations from the FBI or DOJ may emerge, providing insight into the threat assessment.

  • Congressional oversight or questioning may probe the rationale, cost, or precedent for such security expansions.

  • Media scrutiny and internal reactions will help reveal how serious or criticized the decision becomes within the FBI.

  • Bongino’s continued public communications may hint at what he views as urgent priorities or vulnerabilities.


In sum, the allocation of a full-time, multi-agent security detail to Deputy Director Bongino marks a striking escalation in how the Bureau protects its leadership. Whether the move is driven by real threat assessment, institutional reordering, or political signaling, it raises profound questions about power, protection, and transparency in modern federal law enforcement.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *