Dan Bongino Drops a Major Critique on Schiff Before FBI Appointment
Political analyst and former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino has made a striking declaration aimed directly at Senator Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), igniting a fierce conversation just days before his anticipated appointment as deputy director of the FBI by former President Donald Trump. In a recent episode of his popular podcast, Bongino delivered unreserved criticism of Schiff, revisiting the long-standing debate over alleged Russian interference in U.S. elections. Bongino accused Schiff of perpetuating what he termed the “Russia collusion hoax,” a topic that has dominated political discourse for years.
Bongino’s stance was clear from the outset as he questioned, “Why is Adam Schiff so concerned?” He encouraged his audience to reconsider the entire narrative surrounding Russian interference, urging them to revisit what he calls the “Russia collusion hoax.” Bongino is firm in his belief that the matter should not be brushed aside. “I’m going to be blunt with you. I don’t want to move on from this,” he declared, emphasizing his commitment to keeping the discussion alive.
Bongino argued that the Russian interference claims were not the result of independent investigations, but instead the product of a coordinated effort by various entities. These included federal agencies, members of Congress, foreign governments, and international intelligence officials, he claimed. He emphasized that these parties worked together to fabricate a narrative that could have caused significant diplomatic damage. “We had the FBI, the Department of Justice, members of Congress, foreign governments, and intelligence agencies creating a story that could have deeply harmed relations with a nuclear-armed adversary,” he said. According to Bongino, this was not mere political drama; it was a potentially disastrous situation with far-reaching consequences.
Bongino’s determination to seek the truth is unwavering. He made it clear that he was not going to let the matter fade away. “This is going to be important in the coming days,” he warned. “I’m not letting this go. I want to find out what happened because it cannot happen again. Not to a Democrat, not a Republican, not a Libertarian, not to any U.S. citizen.” Bongino’s message is a call to action, urging his followers to remain engaged and to continue questioning the established narrative. He also did not hesitate to call out Schiff, labeling him as the “ringmaster” of the misinformation circus. “Who was the ringmaster of that circus? Yes, Adam Schiff, and no, I’m not letting it go,” Bongino asserted, signaling a potential shift in focus for investigations into the Russia allegations.
Adding to the unfolding drama, a new development regarding Schiff’s legal standing has sparked further discussion. Former President Joe Biden had preemptively pardoned Schiff for his involvement with the Democrat-led January 6 Commission. While Schiff accepted the pardon, he expressed doubts about its necessity in an official statement. “I continue to believe that granting pardons to a committee that undertook such important work to uphold the law was unnecessary and unwise,” Schiff stated. Nonetheless, he acknowledged that political pressures from Trump and his law enforcement appointees may have played a role in Biden’s decision.
The specifics of the pardon remain unclear, with reports indicating that it provides “full and unconditional” coverage for any offenses tied to Schiff’s actions during the January 6 Commission. However, it remains uncertain whether it applies to Schiff’s involvement in the Russia investigation or his comments regarding President Trump’s alleged connections to Russian President Vladimir Putin. This uncertainty has only deepened the debate about Schiff’s role and the motivations behind the pardon.
The pardon’s ramifications have also been felt by other prominent figures connected to the January 6 Commission. Former Representative Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and Representative Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) issued a joint statement, asserting that the pardon was granted due to “extraordinary circumstances.” They emphasized that their work on the committee was motivated by a commitment to truth and accountability, not a desire for personal protection.
Bongino’s explosive remarks, combined with his anticipated new role at the FBI, suggest that the controversies surrounding the Russia investigation and the January 6 Commission are far from over. His insistence on reexamining these past events signals that Bongino may focus his future efforts on revisiting these unresolved issues.
As political tensions mount, Schiff’s acceptance of the pardon, coupled with his doubts about its necessity, underscores the division within the political landscape. It highlights the ongoing debates surrounding accountability, transparency, and the motivations behind key political decisions. Bongino’s message is clear: he intends to keep the focus on the unresolved questions about the Russia investigation and challenge the narratives that have shaped public opinion.
The coming days will undoubtedly be crucial in determining how the national conversation on justice, accountability, and transparency unfolds. Bongino’s comments, along with the continued revelations surrounding Schiff’s role, signal that the debate is far from settled. Whether Bongino’s efforts will lead to significant changes or renewed investigations remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the questions surrounding the Russia investigation, Schiff’s actions, and the January 6 Commission are far from over.