Ohio Representative Jim Jordan is once again calling for a comprehensive investigation into former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s role in the events surrounding the January 6 Capitol attack. Jordan argues that the inquiry into the riot has been lopsided, with too much focus on former President Donald Trump, while neglecting other critical factors that contributed to the chaos. In a recent interview, he emphasized the need for a deeper investigation into Pelosi’s actions and decisions leading up to the attack, insisting that full transparency is necessary for a complete understanding of the incident.

Jordan’s push for broader investigations extends beyond the Capitol attack. He argues that Democrats have directed the national conversation toward Trump, deliberately sidestepping more pressing national issues, such as rising crime rates, border security, and inflation. “They want to focus on Trump, but they’re ignoring the real problems that everyday Americans are facing,” Jordan remarked. “This is less about justice and more about political targeting.”

The congressman has also voiced his criticism of the January 6 Commission, claiming that the investigation has been politically charged. According to Jordan, the commission has failed to address Pelosi’s role in securing the Capitol and other critical factors that led to the riot. “If we are truly seeking accountability, it should be for everyone involved, not just the political opponents,” he argued, calling for a more balanced investigation.

This sentiment is shared by other Republicans, including Georgia Representative Barry Loudermilk, who recently revealed that House Speaker Mike Johnson is working to establish a new committee to investigate the events surrounding January 6. Loudermilk explained that the new committee would revisit aspects of the investigation that, in their view, were handled with political bias. He noted that the effort to reexamine the events would also include further scrutiny of former GOP Representative Liz Cheney, emphasizing the need for fairness in the investigative process.

“The aim is not to simply rehash what’s already been reported, but to uncover information that was deliberately overlooked or suppressed,” Loudermilk said. He explained that the Republican-led committee would ensure that accountability is applied equally to all those involved in the events of January 6, instead of focusing only on Trump and his allies.

Alongside their push for a renewed investigation into January 6, Republicans have also reissued subpoenas related to Special Counsel Robert Hur’s investigation into President Joe Biden’s handling of classified documents. Another set of subpoenas targets the Justice Department’s handling of the Hunter Biden investigation. This signals a broader effort by Republicans to address what they see as selective prosecution and partisan enforcement of the law.

“There cannot be two sets of rules—one for political allies and another for opponents,” Jordan remarked, further emphasizing the need for fairness in the investigative process. “If we are truly committed to justice, we must be willing to examine every aspect of the situation, no matter where it leads.”

On the Democratic side, California Senator Adam Schiff has expressed opposition to certain pardons issued by President Biden to individuals involved in the January 6 events. Schiff suggested that rejecting these pardons could help avoid the perception of admitting guilt and emphasized that pardons should not shield individuals from testifying under oath when subpoenaed. He reiterated that the American people deserve the truth, and that accountability should apply to all those involved.

“We need to make sure that those who played a role in the January 6 attack are held accountable,” Schiff stated, highlighting the ongoing political divide over how to address the aftermath of the riot.

Jordan, meanwhile, remains steadfast in his call for a more thorough investigation into Pelosi’s role and the security planning leading up to the attack. He insists that understanding what Pelosi knew, what security measures were in place, and why certain decisions were made is crucial to preventing similar incidents in the future. “If this investigation were truly unbiased, these questions would have already been addressed,” he said.

Jordan’s call for a broader inquiry has garnered support among conservatives who believe that the original investigation was politically motivated to harm Trump, while ignoring broader systemic issues. As Republicans continue to push for further scrutiny of Pelosi and other key figures, the political divide in Washington deepens.

The future of this renewed investigation remains uncertain, but it could have significant implications for both those involved and the broader national conversation about transparency and accountability. Whether this effort leads to meaningful change or simply deepens political divisions, the battle over the narrative of January 6 is far from over.