Alina Habba Warns Federal Workers: Alignment with ‘America First’ Policy is a Must

Washington, D.C. – Alina Habba, a key legal advisor to President Donald Trump, made a strong statement during an interview on Fox News with Sean Hannity. She emphasized that federal employees who do not align with the administration’s “America First” philosophy will be removed from their posts. Habba’s remarks followed recent actions by the Justice Department’s acting attorney general, who dismissed several career prosecutors working under special counsel Jack Smith in cases involving President Trump. This move has sparked significant debate about political loyalty within federal agencies, especially regarding the Justice Department’s role under the Trump administration.

Federal Workers’ Commitment to Policy Agenda

During her appearance on Hannity’s show, Habba addressed the need for federal employees to align with the president’s policy goals. “If you are not aligned with ‘America First,’ you should not be working in this administration,” she said. The message was clear: individuals who are not fully committed to supporting Trump’s vision should not occupy positions within the federal government. According to Habba, the focus should be on ensuring that those within the Executive Branch are loyal to the nation and its elected leadership, not to their personal or partisan interests.

Her statement is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to reshape the federal workforce. Habba suggested that the President’s agenda could be better advanced if federal agencies are staffed by individuals who are devoted to fulfilling the country’s best interests, rather than bureaucrats with their own agendas.

The Justice Department’s Reshaping

Habba’s comments came in the wake of the Justice Department’s shakeup. Acting Attorney General, in a controversial move, dismissed more than a dozen federal prosecutors who had worked with special counsel Jack Smith on investigations into President Trump. These prosecutors had been involved in cases surrounding Trump’s handling of classified documents and allegations related to the 2020 election. With Trump’s return to office, the administration is making moves to overhaul leadership within key government agencies, including the Department of Justice.

This shift has drawn criticism from some quarters, particularly those concerned about the independence of the Justice Department. Critics argue that the dismissals could be seen as an effort to undermine the department’s neutrality. However, Trump’s supporters view these changes as necessary, claiming that the actions of the dismissed prosecutors reflected political bias and interference in the legal system.

A senior White House official anonymously defended the dismissals, asserting that the prosecutors were not acting as neutral legal professionals, but instead focused on cases against the President. “These individuals were not impartial,” the official said. “They were involved in politically motivated cases targeting the President.”

Conservative Support for the Administration’s Stance

Habba’s statements received praise from conservative figures and Trump’s allies, who argue that the removal of career bureaucrats is essential for advancing conservative policies. Ohio Representative Jim Jordan, a staunch Trump supporter, praised the decision, calling it part of a broader effort to “drain the swamp.” He criticized career bureaucrats for their perceived role in undermining the will of the people, asserting that their allegiance should lie with the American public and not with any particular political party.

Former Trump adviser Stephen Miller also supported the administration’s stance, saying, “The FBI, DOJ, and other government agencies should serve the interests of the people, not the ideological ambitions of a few insiders.”

Concerns About Political Loyalty Tests

Despite the strong backing from conservatives, the Trump administration’s approach has been met with significant pushback from Democrats and ethics experts. Many argue that the increased emphasis on political loyalty could undermine the integrity of the civil service.

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) strongly criticized the administration’s policy, warning that it could set a dangerous precedent. “We cannot turn our government into a political loyalty test,” Warren said. “Federal employees take an oath to uphold the Constitution, not to pledge allegiance to a president or political party.”

Government ethics experts have echoed Warren’s concerns, pointing to the potential risks of politicizing the federal workforce. They argue that when federal employees are evaluated based on their loyalty to the president rather than their competence and adherence to the law, it could erode public trust in government institutions.

The Future of the Federal Workforce

As the debate over the Trump administration’s treatment of federal workers continues, it remains unclear how these changes will ultimately impact the government’s ability to function impartially. While Trump’s allies see this as a necessary step to clear out entrenched bureaucratic resistance, critics warn of the potential dangers of eroding the independence of the federal workforce.

The ongoing restructuring of the Justice Department and other agencies will likely continue to be a contentious issue in the years ahead, as both sides of the political spectrum push for changes to how the government operates. Regardless of the outcome, one thing is clear: the Trump administration’s stance on federal workers and political loyalty is set to shape the future of U.S. governance.